Leave a comment

The Open-Hearted Book Club

Last weekend, I watched disheartened as people dressed up their arguments about (primarily against) #takeaknee in the bodies of dead troops, attempting to speak for them and say what they would or would not have condoned or wanted, what is the proper way to honor them. Most of us have absolutely no idea what the average veteran’s experience is like and we tend to trot them out only when it suits our purposes.

We do not acknowledge that we have been a nation at war for nearly sixteen years.

We do not call our elected officials every day to ask for better care for returning veterans.

We often don’t even check in with our veterans to see how we, as a populace, can serve those who are serving us.

Instead, we revel in the days off for Veterans and Memorial Days, we shop at sales, and we wrap our bums in flag bikinis on the Fourth of July (I think this is probably one of the biggest ways in which we disrespect the flag). Many of us are remarkably removed from and willfully ignorant of what our service members are experiencing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Last weekend made it more evidence than ever that if we intend to honor our veterans, that lack of knowledge needs to change. An eagle on your shirt and a sticker on your car doesn’t actually do anything for our troops. Concentrated action to directly benefit them does.

I’m reading People of the Whale by Linda Hogan now and came across this passage, which further underscored the idea of our actual distance from what our troops are involved in these days:

“Like all women left behind in wars, she was young but old, both at the same time. Wars amputate the minds and souls of waiting women in different ways than they do the armless, legless bodies in khaki and olive drab or the children stepping on land mines. But it is an amputation all the same. Watching the bullets, the men surviving fire, the dying children, what the women saw on television gave them some truth and from them on American wars were not on the television because people would rise up against their own government if they saw what they had done.”

This brings me to the point of this post. A while back I had an idea for the Open-Hearted Book Club. The video explains it all, but the gist is that books have been scientifically shown to enhance and improve our compassion and empathy. I had planned to start with a light-hearted book, which I intend to do next time, and then I read Phil Klay’s Redeployment. I have not been the same since. It seared my eyebrows off. So I decided to start with that one.

I couldn’t get the words right in a post and I recorded a video, but I’ve historically not been a fan of hearing my own voice, so I held off on editing it (the editing is minimal because I’m still learning and it is a Saturday and I have young kids. Same goes for this post). After last weekend, though, I realized that it’s too necessary a book to not share due to vanity.

So, without further ado, welcome to the first installment of the Open-Hearted Book Club featuring Redeployment.

Open-Hearted Book Club 1



Learning from my love bird captive

In a mindless moment, I did one of those Facebook quizzes. You know the kind, it purports to “analyze” your profile to tell you something deep about your soul, while leeching personal information. I needed a moment to let something important for work percolate and this quiz did not force me select the least evil from an unattractive palette of colors or choose between bourbon and champagne (while that is a regular choice for me, I prefer not to limit my options before 5 p.m.). It could hardly be called a quiz at all since all I had to do was click a button and wait while it popped up with answer as to which bird my soul most resembled.

It pronounced love bird as my bird-soul match, with this description: “You’re a lovely person. You’re warm and full of affection and love for all of the people who deserve your love. You’re a bundling ball of positivity.” I laughed. Out loud. Not because I’m not warm and loving. Most days I am, though “bundling ball of positivity” is only one of the two extremes I inhabit. I laughed because I once had a love bird and it was the meanest bird I have ever met.

I no longer remember the bird’s name, but I remember well its reign of terror. It started on Super Bowl Sunday 1985. My dad and some friends were watching the game, a ridiculous shame considering we lived next to the ocean in Hawaii and our term there was halfway over. Like I would prove to be every Super Bowl Sunday since then, I was bored. And mopey. My friends were at parties, my parents occupied, my brother not sure he wanted to be friends that day. So, I opened the door to go explore and standing on the pathway was a love bird.

By way of background, I rescued every stray animal I could find during these days. At one point, we were up to four cats who were forced to remain outdoors (we already had an indoor cat) and an abandoned baby bird, who unfortunately died the first day of school the September before the love bird came onto the scene. We’d surrendered the cats and I felt an empty rescuer hole that ached to be filled. Enter the unsuspecting love bird.

I had not seen a wild love bird before and I suspected it was someone’s pet. I immediately called for reinforcements, i.e., my brother and a butterfly net. Perhaps a neighbor kid, too. (It’s been 30+ years, so I apologize if I exclude crediting anyone in this debacle who truly deserves to be named.) We managed to catch it, quite easily, and promptly put it in a cage, which we’d just happened to have handy since we had another avian captive in the house (this one a cockatiel and procured from a local pet shop).

Like we did with Bill, the cockatiel, we would let the love bird out. Only, unlike Bill, who was docile and acquiescing, the love bird would not want to go back in to the cage. The love bird didn’t preen our hair like Bill did. It didn’t imitate my laugh. No, that sucker bit us every chance it got. It drew blood multiple times from multiple people. I remember one particular time wherein my brother, two neighbors and I had donned ourselves in various protective garments (such as my dad’s flight jacket and helmet) and armed ourselves with nets and tennis rackets in an attempt to get the bird back in the cage (I do not recall why he’d been let out, but at that point it was considered in our house akin to letting Hannibal Lecter roam freely. There would be casualties).

I took it as a personal rejection by the bird. Couldn’t it see that I had rescued it? Rescued from what, though? From a horrific life of abundant food in a land of abundant sunshine and glorious trees? Couldn’t it see that a caged, safe life was infinitely preferable to whatever heights it might reach on its own, or possible death?

As an adult, I can see the true failing was not the bird’s lack of appreciation for its gilded cell, but rather my own need to “save” a creature from its innate desires and preferred trajectory simply because I could not see any other way. My imagination had failed in the shadow of my towering good intentions. I knew what was best for it. And I was wrong.

If I were that bird, having once tasted freedom, I, too, would have scratched, bitten, and made a race for the door. I might have also given my fellow captive a giant bird middle finger, or whatever their equivalent of it would be. Bill received a lot of love and he’d never known any other life, but a bird is made to fly, not to sit and preen a little girl’s hair, as adorable as that may be to said little girl.

I think about this love bird situation now in many ways, one of which is in terms of what it means to be a good ally. So many of us well-meaning white, middle- to upper-class, straight, cis, non-disabled people called to work in social justice are not only filled with righteous indignation of behalf of those oppressed, we are also filled with solutions as to how to fix said oppression. These solutions necessarily come from a wellspring directly connected to the privileged lives we’ve led. The solutions we propose directly correlate to the lives we’ve known and the norms we’ve accepted. We want to offer a gilded cage because it is what we know, but we fail to acknowledge that self-determination, while it may be fraught with perceived pitfalls and danger (in our humble opinions), is the only true justice.

We all hold some area of expertise, maybe more than one. Too often, I see it wielded as a weapon against those who don’t share that knowledge. Facebook is riddled with posts that effectively say, “If this person/you wasn’t/weren’t such a dumbass, you would know X and act accordingly and then your life wouldn’t be so miserable.” This sentiment seems amplified when the recipient of said knowledge has a mental illness or lacks the financial resources of the “knowledgeable” person, or simply isn’t presenting the demand for justice in a way the hearer finds palatable.

What we can forget, myself included, is that our knowledge isn’t whole or perfect. It’s the sliver we’ve gained through our personal experience and exposure to a particularized background. There are other lenses through which we can view a situation. For example, going back the bird, I saw myself at the time as a rescuer of a distressed animal and the actions I took were those that any true animal lover would (how my parents tolerated my often misguided righteousness, I’ll never know). The animal lover in me now would never keep a bird. Same underlying emotion and motivation – love and concern – vastly different outcome based on a new perspective and knowledge gained.

Now, any time I have that fiery impulse to rescue, I stop. I ask myself what the perceived harm is, whether my perception might be lacking some key nugget of information, and what solution I’m proposing. If that solution has me front and center as a white knight, I get off my steed and ask more questions: what skills I really have to bring to the table, how might I reasonably be able to help, and, most importantly, who I can listen to so that I can learn more?

There are times when my particularized knowledge and experience can legitimately help someone. There are times when my privilege proves useful to another. I find it helpful in those moments to ask myself why I am sharing whatever I am called upon to share in that moment. There is a lot I don’t know in this world and I find that whenever someone is teaching me something, if they do so from a place of superiority, I won’t learn it. I will learn to dislike said person, though, and distrust them. They don’t even have to say anything overt. The energy of their motivation flows through and it’s either clear or murky as sewer water.

Each time we judge ourselves as knowing more than another, we’re offering up a sweet taste of our own personal sludge. We do the same each time we judge another because their idea of what is true doesn’t match our own. We live in such a magnificently rich world, it seems entirely within the realm of possibility that more than one perspective can be true.* That someone doesn’t want to live in our version of the best life possible doesn’t make that person wrong. What we offer might seem like a cage. If we want to get to a place of unity, we need to accept that the concept requires a coming together of different pieces. We are only a piece of the knowledge, a piece of the solution. We are not the solution ourselves (not to mention that a solution to society’s problems often takes a different way of thinking than that used to create the problem in the first place).

I will remember my love bird, then, not as vicious, bloodthirsty menace who refused to graciously accept the help (read: captivity) I offered. Instead, I will remember that time in my life as a challenge to do better by listening more and stretching myself to accept more possibilities about what is in the good of all than only those immediately visible to me.

*Caveat: Having finally seen Star Wars Episode 7 yesterday and, therefore, having acutely thought about the imbalance in favor of pure evil depicted, I find it incumbent upon myself to state the obvious: if someone is planning on massacring any number of people (be it one or millions), that is clearly wrong. I have yet to evolve to a place where I can see another side to that story and I would do everything I could to stop such action (or so I believe). This commentary stems from seeing a number of well-meaning people who have the power to do so act on behalf of a group in a way that expressly deviates from action that group has stated would be to its benefit, or seeing people criticize movements such as Black Lives Matter not for the message they present but rather how they do so.


Hey, Mr. DJ. Time to make some space on stage

Every morning I do drop-off with my three-year-old daughter goes the same way. Except this morning. Most days, we’ve just left her brother’s school and she wants to listen to music on the short drive. I turn on the radio and she asks, “Is that lady music?” by which she means, “Is that a woman singing?”

We have SiriusXM, so I have access to a bajillion channels. It’s like the cable of the radio world – more channels than you know what to do with, and never the right thing on. I flip through channel after channel desperately hoping for a woman – any woman – to be singing.  I don’t know how many times I’ve prayed for Bette Midler, sure she’s a long shot, but she seems to show up when you least expect her.

It’s only a ten-minute drive and we spend most of it channel flipping. Or I get tired and lie to her and try to convince her that some high falsetto is actually a woman. I don’t think she’s buys it.

Today she didn’t ask for “lady music”. She did, however, veto every song with a man in it, so it was the channel flipping scenario it is most mornings. Except, I sensed a fatigue, and not just one brought on by not enough sleep and too much sugar for breakfast. It was a weariness with our song selections and our frenzied radio ritual. I felt it too. I opted for some Neko Case on my iPhone and that at least stopped the incessant switching.

The whole incident left me frustrated in a hard-to-pin-down-way. There is plenty of arguably good music on the radio (plenty not-so-good as well). So, why, then, this feeling of malaise of not being able to find any “lady music” during a 10-minute window in the morning. And then I realized it might have had something to do with the other part of the ritual. The part wherein I say, “No, that’s Bruce Springsteen. He’s a man. Elvis Presley is a dude. Jimmy Buffett, too. Oh, wait, here’s the ‘Venus’ channel. Oh, but that’s a man singing. Why don’t we try opera?”

I checked SiriusXM’s line-up and they have 24 channels dedicated to male singers/performers or a particular male host*. They have ONE channel described as airing female hosts, SiriusXMStars, which features Ellen DeGeneres, Jenny McCarthy, and Dr. Laura. So, these ladies don’t even get their own channel. They have to share. And I’ll be honest, I don’t know what the Venus channel has to do with women. It does air some songs by women, but just as often, it’s got solely dudes or duets.

Is this really the biggest issue in the world? Maybe not. Climate change sure scares the sh*t out of me. But, when I came into work, a friend had shared this article in praise of women giving more f*cks and taking some needed action. And just yesterday, I was treated to news of success in a movement to get Black Widow merchandise based on a petition and tweets. So, I’ve decided to start a petition as well. (Please sign it.)

I did a little research this morning and was not particularly surprised, though quite pissed off, to see how some of the popular female performers compare with their male counterparts who are featured on SiriusXM. Channel 4 is Pitbull’s Globalization channel featuring world beats. He’s earned a respectable combined 3 Billboard/Latin Billboard awards. I’ve earned precisely zero.

And while Shakira is more pop-focused, she actually is from another country, which might be helpful for a World Beats channel. Moreover, she’s earned 30 Billboard/Latin Billboard awards and a combined 12 Grammy/Latin Grammy awards. But, yeah, by all means, lets give it to Pitbull.

And, sure, Pearl Jam, Jimmy Buffett, the Grateful Dead, and Bruce Springsteen are all great. But do they all need their own channels? What about Beyonce, who has 20 Grammy awards, just as many Bruce (and more than a few of those others mentioned)? How about Alison Kraus who ranks at #2 in number of total Grammys earned (shared with Quincy Jones) and who also holds the #2 space for total number of Grammys by a group (with Union Station)? What about the Dixie Chicks, who have 13 Grammys, or Alicia Keys, who has 15? Aretha Franklin who has 18? Is that enough? What about Adele or Lady Gaga or, I hate to say it, Taylor Swift? Dolly Parton, anyone?

When you look at the “comedy” offerings, you’ve got Howard Stern, Jamie Foxx, George Carlin, and Jeff Foxworthy/Larry the Cable Guy. A little humor for every kind of bro. But I don’t see any of these guys being asked to host the Emmys. Why not Tina Fey and Amy Poehler? Or Amy Schumer, who is everywhere these days?

This says nothing of the playlist choices made on any given station not devoted to a particular artist.

There isn’t a dearth of female talent out there. It’s EVERYWHERE. Just like women. What exactly does it take for us to rank?

I am tired of spending those precious ten minutes with my daughter in the morning feeling demoralized and marginalized and, frankly, like we don’t have something of value to offer the world aside from cute knitted crafts on Etsy, or a few tears and love in the lab if Tim Hunt is to be believed. As the highest wage earner in my household, you can better believe I’ll have something to say about whether or not we renew our subscriptions.

So, SiriusXM, how about making a little space on stage for some lady music?

*I decided not to even include the EXPANSIVE number of sports stations and their male hosts.


Burying the Dead

Several nights ago, I had a dream that won’t leave me. I sat at the bar in a restaurant lit solely by candles. It had maybe eight tables and my friend served as host and waiter. Aside from the bartender, we were the only two there. Then four soldiers arrived. I knew they were veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, though their camouflage was better suited for the jungle. Each had at least three gas masks hanging off the sides and backs of her or his head. The masks were all clearly gas masks, though they were in different shapes and sizes, some quite colorful. These strangers and what they carried with them were both frightening and intriguing. My friend went to seat them and I asked about the masks. “They are for those we’ve lost.”

Even in my sleep, the direct-action lover in me thought about how powerful a gesture that would be – for veterans to show up carrying their dead. We might understand a little better the risks they face, the losses they incur when we send them to fight so far away. Another part of me, though, knew that wasn’t what this dream was about. Not exactly, anyway. That’s just not how dreams work.

As I sit preparing for the longest, darkest night of the year, I realize that what it’s about is the ghosts I carry with me and burying my own dead. The soldiers in my dream have brought a new solstice ritual my way – the gift of the funeral and the wake.

Yule started last night and in that tradition, it is recognized that this is the time the dead are most active; when our ancestors are closest to us and when draugar (think zombies*) rise and walk the land. It’s not surprising that at this time of year old patterns surface to remind of us of what lies untended.

We all walk around with our dead and not-yet-born (those ideas, fantasies, revenge plots that lie just beyond the horizon). Each time our attention is seized and we are wrenched out of the present moment to re-live something, our dead are calling to us, asking us to learn our lessons and bury them. Ghosts want the same thing we do: freedom. Yet, this time of year, we’re rushing headlong into the new – new gifts under the tree, new resolutions so that we can be a better version of ourselves, new drunken mistakes at the holiday party. We can feel the dead pulling on our sleeves, tugging at our pant legs, begging for a moment or two with us. Yet, we tend to keep walking, straight into the light of the shiny new year and all of its promise.

Many cultures have or have had a tradition of sitting up at night to watch over their dead until they can be laid to rest. I wonder whether and what revelations are shared between the living and their charges. Even when a deceased loved one is shipped straight off to a funeral home, we still spend time mentally communing with them, collecting the years we’ve had with them, releasing the anger and reveling in the joys. That is what our ghosts ask of us now. They ask that we sit with them by candlelight with the same tender care for ourselves and them as we would a lost loved one, to honor the time we’ve had together and the wisdom gained, and then to put them to rest. Once we have done that, we have fertile ground for exploring the new. But if we don’t, we will be haunted throughout the next year and the one after that.

This has been a year of Everest highs and Grand Canyon lows for me. In fact, the last third of the year has seen such dramatic changes that I never could have anticipated. To set goals for the new year now does me a huge disservice. I need some time with what I’ve been able to accomplish, with where I’ve failed, with who I have become. And even though there is a novel to finish by December 31, gifts to wrap, and sweets to make, I will take tonight out to have a tissue-wringing funeral and a whiskey-indulging wake.

When I think of those gas masks my dream soldiers carried, I think of lessons not incorporated. I think of the oxygen and energy those ghosts take from me. I think of all I would be able to do if I was present and not focused on the hot pink contraption hanging off the back of my head.

I pulled a tarot card today asking what would be good to keep in mind as I bury my dead and I got the Seven of Earth. (I used Joanna Powell Colbert’s Gaian Tarot.) The image shows a woman planting a baby cedar by a river and it seemed the perfect representation to me. Once we clear out the old, we have made way for successful new growth. The conditions have to be right for a tree to rise up and it is worth it to clear the way. Cedars provide excellent wood for building houses, boats, and other fundamental structures that support our lives. To create truly lasting change, change that builds us up, we need to take care of the earth in which we plant our seedlings. Burying our dead allows us to clear the path. Incorporating the lessons fertilizes the soil.


May you lay to rest your ghosts tonight and may the year to come be fruitful and beautiful.

*Please note that I have oversimplified here for the purposes of brevity. Draugar are fascinating and worthy of your own research.

1 Comment

Homeland Tarot: Saul Berenson – the Hierophant

I have a deep love for Mandy Patinkin. Inigo Montoya, from The Princess Bride, stole my heart as the loyal grammarian (“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”) set out to avenge his father’s death. (I never did prefer blonds.) The clincher for me came at the end of the film when he said, “I have been in the revenge business so long, now that it’s over, I do not know what to do with the rest of my life.” I was young when the movie came out, but I remember that line moving me more than anything else, the sadness and the emptiness of it. Turns out, that same line moved Mandy Pantinkin when he saw it years later: “I love that line, and I love it for all of us because the purpose of revenge, in my personal opinion, is completely worthless and pointless. And the purpose of existence is to embrace our fellow human being(s). Not be revengeful, and turn our darkness into light.”

Turning darkness into light seems to be a thread for Patinkin, or at least for the characters I have come to know and love. Rube Sofer in Dead Like Me had a sharp tongue, but a large and soft heart. Living on the other side of life, he knew too well the ways we whittle it away with the inconsequential. He often guided George and the other reapers in seeing the higher good or in their role or the universal truths that governed. For example, when George refuses to reap, Rube says to her, “You don’t mess with fate, Peanut. People die when they are meant to die. There’s no discussion. There’s no negotiation. When life’s done, it’s done. You of all people should know that.”

Unlike Rube, Saul Berenson is still very much alive. He too, though, has a sense of how we miss the mark in life. He is the voice of wisdom on Homeland, the voice of judgment and yet also compassion (still with a bit of a sense of humor).


Saul is the figure who most stands for justice on the show, albeit a personalized and slightly twisted version of justice. That said, the card I would pick for him would not be Justice. It would be the Hierophant*.


The Hierophant, being a picture of the medieval Pope, is often linked to a religious or spiritual leader. In Homeland, the characters approach the CIA as though it were a religion, a dogma that dictates every action, every perspective in their lives. They are, for lack of a better phrase, true believers in their mission. There is a certain degree to which the show depicts them as akin to members of a cult, albeit a cult with extraordinarily far-reaching consequences, in that it’s able to infiltrate terrorist groups and carry out international executions.

In the Rider-Waite-Smith deck (see image above), the Hierophant is shown with one arm raised, two fingers up in a peace-like gesture. An interpretation of this is that he is able to bring down higher knowledge and share it with the masses. He mediates between the earthly world and the celestial, like the Pope depicted on the card. (Note that in medieval times, the Pope was not just a religious figure, but also controlled armies and politics.)

Saul is the one true leader on Homeland. With the occasional exception of Quinn, he seems to be the only one who regularly can step back and call on a higher sense of justice and order. It’s interesting, because in Hebrew, the name Saul means “Asked for; inquired of God.” And his perspective carries with it a feeling of holiness, or at least the recognition that there is something sacred in all life. He doesn’t enjoy the life-taking part of his job. Though he seems to believe that when done with the right intention and for the right goal, it is always in the highest good.

The downside to the Hierophant is that this mediation of worlds, the sharing of a greater message, is always done within the confines of an organization. Wisdom is filtered through the lens of the social structure over which the Heirophant figure presides. And this is precisely Saul’s major downfall. He is the voice of reason and justice, but he is also a true believer in the CIA. His version of justice, his higher knowledge is skewed to make sense within the framework of the institution.

This season, Saul has exemplified just that. He outwardly defied his current bosses on moral grounds in the first episode (which would be more a Hierophant reversed, I think). Yet, when confronted with the fact he would need to conform to the expectations of the organization, he fell in line. Hierophants are deeply invested in the organization. Their power comes not from their ability to stand between worlds, but from the position they hold within the hierarchy. In Saul’s case, though, I actually think his ability to make change is the wisdom he’s able to channel and the fact he’s occasionally willing to make a stand for his position.

Last week, he showed another side of the Hierophant by tending to his acolyte; providing guidance, wisdom, and a few minor miracles along the way. He is Carrie’s guru, which is one of the things the card can symbolize. Their conversations are as close as she allows herself to a spiritual view on the world.

Another issue with the Hierophant is that he (traditionally, this card represents a male) can misuse the authority he holds over others. Think Jim Jones or the guy who led the Heaven’s Gate group. There was a glimpse of this possibility at the start of last season when it looked like Saul was hanging Carrie in the press to save the CIA. It turned out, as the case has been so far, that he had a bigger game plan, one that would net a much higher good. Since he is one of my favorite characters, I hope he doesn’t turn out to be shepherd leading the flock astray. Without Saul to serve as the moral compass for the group, the possibilities are alarming.

*Note: Each card has a variety of elements, meanings and interpretations. These brief profiles only discuss a few and, obviously, only the most salient points. This is just one way of viewing the card in the context of a particular person and is by no means the way to either view the card or the character. 🙂

Leave a comment

Homeland Tarot: Carrie Mathison – wielding swords while blindfolded

It’s officially Sunday morning and I’m up after too much coffee at dinner, followed by a minor fiasco wherein I thought my car had been towed in downtown San Francisco, but it turned out I only parked a block away. No matter. It all gave me a chance to think strategy. And strategy on a Sunday always leads me to Homeland.

I’m somewhat of an unlikely show devotee and defender. A few friends, none of whom have seen the show, have accused it of being blind war propaganda and an insidious way to support the war on terror. I see their point. However, being a writer and having seen the show (every episode, actually), I think the show is much more than a vehicle for any possible message about the dangers of terrorists. It’s often about the dangers of those tracking the terrorists, and by extension, the dangers that lurk within each of us. It is about the darkness within that we refuse to see and the ways that can deeply damage even the most noble actions by acting without seeing the entire picture or knowing the true motivation for our choices. And there are few characters that better exemplify this than Carrie Mathison.

*If you have not seen the first episode of season 4, please be aware that there are spoiler alerts below*

It wasn’t until a few days after the show had aired that I realized just how brilliant the first episode of season 4 was. When I first watched it, in the moment I could see that Carrie was still, heartbreakingly, very Carrie. She’s married to the job, to the ideals she’s holding up, and she makes poor choices as a result. But it goes much deeper than that.


This is the two of Swords from the Rider-Waite-Smith tarot deck. This is also Carrie Mathison. One of the primary meanings of the card is that the person is unwilling to look at the situation and blocking oneself off from emotions and refusing to feel them. The symmetry of S4E1 with the first season really drove home for me how much Carrie has deliberately blinded herself to what is going on around her. The tension in the episode overtly builds around her complete abandonment of her daughter in favor of going back to Pakistan to serve as Station Chief. What underlies that surface, though, is much more powerful and has yet to be teased out fully. (Don’t get me wrong, child abandonment is a powerful thing.)

In the first season, Carrie was a terrorist hunter. She tracked Brody and trapped him. By getting close, she learned that he had been turned because of a drone strike that killed innocents, in particular children. In S4E1, she acts on incomplete information, information she openly questions, only to order a drone strike that does much the same – it blows up a wedding. She refused to fully question that gut instinct that told her there was something crucial missing. In the process of doing so, she turned from terrorist hunter to terrorist maker, in one basic order. She did later try to justify the bombing on the grounds that the terrorist sought had indeed died and that those with him knew what kind of man he was and what risk they were taking, but it seemed evident she didn’t buy her own rationalization.

In the Two of Swords card, the person there holds two swords, one in either hand, with arms crossed over the heart and a blindfold over the eyes. This strikes me as particularly fitting because by cutting off the heart, there is a conscious decision to cut off any knowing that comes from a source other than the mind. It was that gut instinct that told Carrie that Brody was a terrorist. Whether or not he turned into a great love for her and the father of her child, she was still dead on about his intentions when he returned home. It was that other knowing, the knowing that came before thought, that made her an excellent agent. Now she’s found herself with more responsibility, both professionally and personally, and she’s closed off a major source of intelligence. Moreover, she’s wielding great weapons without clear vision and harming people in every sphere of her life.

It does make sense that she would shut down emotionally. She watched someone she was in love with be executed, she had his child, and the only place she has ever felt confident is at work. She was never good with handling her emotions, which I think is too easily chalked up to her Bi-Polar Disorder. That is certainly a component of it but, like with most things on the show, is not the entire story.

The Swords cards tend to be all about the rational mind. They are about thinking and logic, processing with the brain and not the heart. What is interesting, though, is that it’s Carrie’s blocking off of this other center of intelligence that makes her unable to adequately see what is before her and use her logical mind to its best abilities. She has willfully blindfolded herself by cutting off her intuition. The only way for her to see clearly is to lay down the swords and remove the blindfold, which would mean opening up her heart.

This isn’t a situation faced by Carrie alone. She is so easy to identify with despite her unlikeable characteristics because she’s on the same archetypal journey many of us are on. Too often, when someone has a knowing that is inexplicable, an intuition, s/he is questioned on what tactile, tangible proof supports it. That’s how it was for Carrie in the first season. She was so rejected by society that she turned to electroshock therapy, only to be vindicated after she underwent the procedure. How often do we do a less medically extreme version of this to ourselves? How often, when questioned, do we back down and accept someone else’s truth as our own? How often do we close our hearts and, in the process, blindfold ourselves because we’re no longer receiving the whole picture? Carrie’s case is always an extreme one, but it’s in that extremity that we can find the safety to see our own shadows, to see the way we cut ourselves off not only from those around us, but from our inner self.

This image of the Two of Swords from Deviant Moon Tarot can take it even further:



When I see this one, it makes me think of the terrorist eradicator meeting the terrorist maker. As you can see, the two warriors share a lower body and each has an element of light and dark (the leg on each side is the reverse of the upper body). To me this speaks of the classic Jungian idea of integrating one’s shadow. Carrie will have to reckon these two sides of herself and I suspect it won’t be an easy task for her. It’s certainly not for anyone who attempts to do so. This is a battle most of us will have to face to some degree in our lives, should we choose to really look at ourselves and our motivations for acting. Where inside us in the one who makes terror for ourselves or others? How can we bring that element into the light?

It will be interesting to see where this journey takes her, at what point she decides to truly see, and, more importantly, what it all costs her.

Leave a comment

When Women Were Birds

So beautiful. So true.

Heaven and Earth by Catrin Welz-Stein via RedBubble Heaven and Earth by Catrin Welz-Stein via RedBubble

“Once upon a time, when women were birds, there was the simple understanding that to sing at dawn and to sing at dusk was to heal the world through joy. The birds still remember what we have forgotten, that the world is meant to be celebrated.” – Terry Tempest Williams from “When Women Were Birds”

Singing at dawn; Singing at Dusk

The rain that started night before last, continues. The desert is thirsty for all this water, so despite my challenges with the drear, I am glad to see us get a good soaking.

However, I miss the birds. I miss them swooping into the yard to discover the bowl of water under my orange tree. I miss their clatter as they drink and bathe. They’ve holed up wherever it is that they hide when it storms. Instead of hearing bird chatter…

View original post 726 more words